I have heard of snopes.com before and I do tend to use it.
Not for urban legends (though I have seen those there before) but I have used
for fact checking articles or when I feel I want a story verified before
posting. Snopes has actually been there for quite some time on the internet and
thus I feel I can give it a certain level of trust—meaning it has never been
wrong for me. I can’t say if it’s been wrong for other people. The layout for Snopes
is kind of in two things. Urban Legends and Conspiracies or things like what
they call “Fact Checks” and that is usually a news story or something political
has come out that needs to be fact checked. The ratings run from “True, Mostly
True, Mostly False, and False”. Much
like political fact checking websites when it is a fact check they seem to have
everything together and it seems to be correct. They also fact check news
stories that come out and gather steam—especially hot button issues such as the
Syrian refugee crisis. As far as coming under fire I’m not sure how they have
come under fire because I’ve never seen any bias they have. However, I did
notice some articles from conservatives….I’ll politely say whining that they
have a liberal bias because supposedly since
it is a 2 person husband/wife team doing research they can’t possibly be right
and that in general they have a liberal bias in their Snopes articles when this
is simply not true. The two people aren’t even politically involved in
anything.
In general I don’t find anything wrong with using Snopes to
fact check an urban legend, a conspiracy theory or a current event and would
trust their site for information.